Altidude is ToddZ

Quote Post

I have asked on several occasions and have never had an answer, which does not mean that there isn’t one, how millions of pieces of unburnt, uncharred paper can be floating over lower Manhattan from the destruction of the WTC towers when the official explanation of the destruction is fires so hot and evenly distributed that they caused the massive steel structures to weaken and fail simultaneously so that the buildings fell in free fall time just as they would if they had been brought down by controlled demolition.  What is the explanation of fires so hot that steel fails but paper does not combust? People don’t even notice the contradictions.

–

Paul Craig Roberts (via azspot)

I’m not sure I follow his petulant-toddler logic, but apparently he’s arguing that there was either a.) no fire or b.) no paper, because the two cannot co-exist within the same mind-bogglingly huge disaster area. Was he watching the same scene as the rest of us? I’m pretty sure, based on seeing all the fire and paper, that there was both fire and paper.

“I have asked on several occasions and have never had an answer…” Here’s your answer, little miss smartypants: The entire buildings were not fully engulfed in flame; many floors were intact (and full of paper) when they collapsed.

Now finish your juice box, we’ll talk about nano-thermites later.

 Via AZspot
  1. abcsoupdot reblogged this from azspot
  2. aqvaria reblogged this from azspot
  3. altidude reblogged this from azspot
  4. nakaonwood reblogged this from azspot
  5. azspot posted this
To Tumblr, Love Metalab